Catmull–Rom spline Vs Mitchell-Netravali

Here everybody can post his problems with PhotoLine
Benutzeravatar
iosoio
Mitglied
Beiträge: 65
Registriert: Mo 27 Apr 2015 21:20

Catmull–Rom spline Vs Mitchell-Netravali

Beitrag von iosoio »

Hello.

Can anybody give me me some practical advise on using Catmul Vs Mitchell and other resampling algorithms; or point me to some resources good to understand which is better and when?

Something deeper than this:
https://miguelwrattensanchez.wordpress. ... chell-rom/

When I have to double the file size I use SAR PseudoLAD (Poisson sharpener or Jensen Edge to sharpen) and Photoline Lanczos 3 to downscale; sometimes Catmul for small non multiple enlargements but I would like to know more to apply a logic choice.
http://www.general-cathexis.com/

I've found a couple of pages but they are pure mathematics.
Papa, Papa, ich möchte ein Clown sein, wenn ich groß bin.
Bravo, sag deiner Mutter, sie soll dich nach Italien bringen, um als Richterin zu lernen!
Benutzeravatar
Herbert123
Mitglied
Beiträge: 2172
Registriert: Sa 12 Mai 2012 21:38

Re: Catmull–Rom spline Vs Mitchell-Netravali

Beitrag von Herbert123 »

An excellent explanation, plus comparisons:
https://pixinsight.com/doc/docs/Interpo ... ithms.html

Both Catmull-Rom and Mitchell-Netravali do a great job when down-sampling images. Catmull-Rom keeps the details sharper/more contrast rich than MN.
/*---------------------------------------------*/
System: Win10 64bit - i7 920@3.6Ghz, p6t Deluxe v1, 48gb (6x8gb RipjawsX), Nvidia GTX1080 8GB, Revodrive X2 240gb, e-mu 1820, 2XSamsung SA850 (2560*1440) and 1XHP2408H 1920*1200 portrait