Neue Testversion 22.90b6

Hier diskutieren die Betatester von PhotoLine untereinander und mit den Entwicklern
Martin Huber
Entwickler
Entwickler
Posts: 3929
Joined: Tue 19 Nov 2002 15:49

Re: Neue Testversion 22.90b6

Post by Martin Huber »

shijan wrote: Thu 01 Apr 2021 17:43- I know it was discussed before, but Fujifilm RAW files are still very slow to open (16-17 seconds compare to 1-2 seconds for similar sized regular bayer raw files. Tested on macOS 10.14.6). Opening speed doesn't depends of RAW compression.
I still can't reproduce that. They need about 3s here. What are your Raw settings?
shijan wrote: Thu 01 Apr 2021 17:43- Fujifilm lossy compressed format is not supported at all yet.
Yes, lossy isn't supported.

Martin
User avatar
shijan
Mitglied
Posts: 1070
Joined: Mon 23 Dec 2019 15:21
Location: Ukraine

Re: Neue Testversion 22.90b6

Post by shijan »

Yes, really strange. Maybe it is somehow related to macOS version? Maybe PhotoLine use some system options available only in in newest macOS versions?
My mchine is 6 core/12 thread overclocked i7 processor, SSD drive, Radeon RX 580 8 GB, so it is not a slow hardware problem for sure. macOS 10.14.6
As i told earlier - only single thread is active when X-Trans raw file is opened and processed. So i guess this may be the main problem of slowdown.
Nothing special with raw settings i use.
Image
PhotoLine UI Icons Customization Project: https://www.pl32.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6302
Martin Huber
Entwickler
Entwickler
Posts: 3929
Joined: Tue 19 Nov 2002 15:49

Re: Neue Testversion 22.90b6

Post by Martin Huber »

shijan wrote: Mon 19 Apr 2021 12:02As i told earlier - only single thread is active when X-Trans raw file is opened and processed. So i guess this may be the main problem of slowdown.
Nothing special with raw settings i use.
It's the interpolation. X-Trans is currently only multithreaded with AHD. I will change that.

Martin
Martin Huber
Entwickler
Entwickler
Posts: 3929
Joined: Tue 19 Nov 2002 15:49

Re: Neue Testversion 22.90b6

Post by Martin Huber »

maxwell wrote: Tue 13 Apr 2021 15:53 Werden anschließend Ebenen erzeugt, so findet kein Belichtungsausgleich statt (Bild 3 und Bild 4). Um die Ebenenanpassung von Hand weiter durchführen zu können, ist dies genauso erwünscht.

bild3.jpg[/attachment
[attachment=1]bild4.jpg
Erzeugt man nun aus den Ebenen wieder ein Panorama, so stimmt dieses nicht mehr mit dem im ersten Schritt erzeugten Panorama überein (Bild 5 und Bild 6)
bild5.jpg
Es funktioniert nicht, mit diesen bereits augerichteten Bildern erneut ein Panorama zu erstellen. Aber das hast du bereits selbst festgestellt :-)

Der ursprüngliche Gedanke war, dass man in diesem Modus das Überblenden mittels Ebenenmasken selbst erledigt, aber wahrscheinlich ist das nicht praktikabel. Wir bräuchten eventuell einen Modus in der Panoramafunktion, in dem bereits ausgerichtete Bilder einfach nur zusammengerechnet werden.

Martin
User avatar
shijan
Mitglied
Posts: 1070
Joined: Mon 23 Dec 2019 15:21
Location: Ukraine

Re: Neue Testversion 22.90b6

Post by shijan »

Martin Huber wrote: Mon 26 Apr 2021 10:38
shijan wrote: Mon 19 Apr 2021 12:02As i told earlier - only single thread is active when X-Trans raw file is opened and processed. So i guess this may be the main problem of slowdown.
Nothing special with raw settings i use.
It's the interpolation. X-Trans is currently only multithreaded with AHD. I will change that.
Yes, i can confirm. AHD interpolation opens X-Trans files fast and using all processing cores.
PhotoLine UI Icons Customization Project: https://www.pl32.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6302