maho wrote: ↑Tue 04 Jun 2024 04:35
Great work on the Wikipedia updates guys!
One possible issue remains - the current wiki page claims that one of the PL developers is an Olympic gymnast born in 1934. Might want to remove that link if it happens to be untrue... LOL.
Yep, noticed that myself earlier... I changed the wiki code in Visual Studio Code, and pasted it back into Wikipedia - only to discover that the empty Gerhard link had been automatically linked to that gymnast!
I fixed it earlier.
Has Gerhard definitively stated that he is NOT a 90 year old Olympic gymnast???
Herbert123 wrote: ↑Tue 04 Jun 2024 05:59
Before I upload the PhotoLine icon/logo, I need permission from Gerhard and Martin to do so. The image is uploaded to wikipedia and I need explicit permission because it is not my logo - it's theirs.
Herbert123 wrote: ↑Tue 04 Jun 2024 05:59
Before I upload the PhotoLine icon/logo, I need permission from Gerhard and Martin to do so. The image is uploaded to wikipedia and I need explicit permission because it is not my logo - it's theirs.
It's fully OK to use the images.
I've updated the PhotoLine icon on the Wikipedia page. Looks pretty good now!
Thought about that, but that would be an aside to the article information itself and wouldn't provide in neutral unique encyclopedic understanding that expands on the subject of PhotoLine.
Also i guess it make sense add info that PhotoLine support LUTs in HaldCLUT and Cube format. And that PhotoLine use LibRaw to process RAW files.
And also add PhotoLine to LibRaw apps inst in their Wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibRaw
shijan wrote: ↑Tue 04 Jun 2024 22:04
Also i guess it make sense add info that PhotoLine support LUTs in HaldCLUT and Cube format. And that PhotoLine use LibRaw to process RAW files.
And also add PhotoLine to LibRaw apps inst in their Wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibRaw
Added the Raw info, but I think I should be adding that supported files section first before listing LUT support.
Maybe something like this? or too many details?:
Core functionality of PhotoLine can be extended through standard Photoshop filter plugins, brushes, swatches, curves the G'MIC digital image processing framework, PSP tubes and Color Lookups.
Photo management and cataloging options available in Browse window module. Batch Converting functionality also available.
But yes, formally .CUBE and HaldCLUT are supported file types, as well as Adobe's .ACO Swatches, .ABR Brushes and .ACV Curves
Also i guess it is important to note in file types that HaldCLUT supported in TIFF and PNG with any type of compression and any bit depth. This is important because many other apps can't read compressed TIFF or require only TIFF, or only PNG.
I didn't test other HaldCLUT image formats in PhotoLine, but i guess it may read any image format.
is this a mistake or .LD file extension really exists?
Native PhotoLine files have the extension. LD or. PLD, which is an abbreviation of "PhotoLine Document".
Also i guess it is better to use letters in bold same as done in other articles, like this:
Native PhotoLine files have the extension .PLD, which is an abbreviation of "PhotoLine Document".
shijan wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 16:52
is this a mistake or .LD file extension really exists?
Native PhotoLine files have the extension. LD or. PLD, which is an abbreviation of "PhotoLine Document".
Also i guess it is better to use letters in bold same as done in other articles, like this:
Native PhotoLine files have the extension .PLD, which is an abbreviation of "PhotoLine Document".
Yes, I wondered the same thing when I first edited the original text. I left it in, just in case. Perhaps Gerhard can provide us with more information about the .LD extension?
Gerhard Huber wrote: ↑Fri 07 Jun 2024 06:01
There is no .LD extension in PhotoLine. I don't know why it is there.
I assume it was an editing mistake left behind by a past text change. You know: PLD --> XLD, and they forgot to clean up the text afterwards. Then later people just assumed a second extension is supported (I did!).
