Hi Martin & Gerhard,
Are there any plans to release a PhotoLine binary optimized for Intel-based Macs? That seems to be the way Steve Jobs is taking his company. Would such a version run much faster than the Universal binary?
Thank you.
PhotoLine for Intel based Macs
-
- Mitglied
- Beiträge: 94
- Registriert: So 18 Mai 2003 02:02
-
- Entwickler
- Beiträge: 4161
- Registriert: Di 19 Nov 2002 15:49
Re: PhotoLine for Intel based Macs
An Universal Binary contains a binary for Intel-based Macs. Or do you mean something different?maho hat geschrieben:Are there any plans to release a PhotoLine binary optimized for Intel-based Macs? That seems to be the way Steve Jobs is taking his company. Would such a version run much faster than the Universal binary?
Martin
-
- Mitglied
- Beiträge: 94
- Registriert: So 18 Mai 2003 02:02
Re: PhotoLine for Intel based Macs
I was under the perhaps mistaken assumption that an Intel optimized binary would be smaller or faster than a Universal binary.
-
- Entwickler
- Beiträge: 4161
- Registriert: Di 19 Nov 2002 15:49
Re: PhotoLine for Intel based Macs
An Intel only version would be significantly smaller than an universal binary, but not faster.maho hat geschrieben:I was under the perhaps mistaken assumption that an Intel optimized binary would be smaller or faster than a Universal binary.
Martin
-
- Mitglied
- Beiträge: 35
- Registriert: Mi 16 Jan 2008 20:13
Re: PhotoLine for Intel based Macs
There's probably a simple utility out there to do this by now, but here's how to "thin out" universal binaries:
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php? ... 9195046756
Personally, disk space is cheap. I wouldn't bother.
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php? ... 9195046756
Personally, disk space is cheap. I wouldn't bother.