Reaction to a Review

Here everybody can post his problems with PhotoLine
bkh
Beta Tester
Beiträge: 3687
Registriert: Do 26 Nov 2009 22:59

Re: Reaction to a Review

Beitrag von bkh »

greenmorpher hat geschrieben:You guys are thinking hard about the menus so I'll give you some more food for thought. Some examples of the Canvas menus with some explanations. Canvas is a valid comparison because it is an integrated program as is PhotoLine. Canvas started from the vector end of things, though, and PL from the raster end -- and the difference shows as you would expect. For all that, though, on the question of menus there is -- or could be -- much common ground.
Yes, but this discussion is really only about arranging existing commands in the menus, since this is about all that PL users can change in the PL UI.
greenmorpher hat geschrieben:As noted, in Canvas you work on the page all the time. Different objects and different kinds of objects can all be on the same layer unless you wish to separate them, but on that layer, they are in a stacking order.
Frankly, I don't see the advantage of having different objects in the same layer - as opposed to putting them together in a group in PL. You can easily move objects in and out of the group and change the stacking, simply by dragging layers around in the Layers dialog. How would you do that in Canvas?
greenmorpher hat geschrieben:There are two kinds of selection for both vector and raster objects -- the object selection (where you do the overall stuff) and the editing selection (where you do the detail stuff). Kind of.
I imagine the first kind is like the layer tool in PL. But I don't understand the second one.
greenmorpher hat geschrieben:All the stuff in the Image menu has to do only with images or with image-orientated stuff when images interact with vectors. One example -- "Trim to Path". You put a vector path/outline on a photo then select both, go Trim to Path, and the result is a photo clipped as in using a Clipping Path (in the Object menu, Path sub-menu), but the result is rendered as a new image with transparent surround, and the original and path are disposed of. (At least, that's how I see it working -- I suspect it is really a script behind the tool. A really handy thing.)
This would have been my naïve interpretation of an image menu as well.

To do something like "Trim to path" in PL, you'd convert the vector path to a layer mask (the equivalent of a clipping path), then use "Reduce to one layer".
Alternatively, you convert the vector path to a lasso, and then crop the resulting selection.

Now "Reduce to one layer" works for whatever complicated combination of layers you have created previously, not just in the particular case of a layer mask. And converting a vector path to a selection can be used for many purposes, not just for cropping. Frankly, I prefer a simple combination of more universal commands like "Reduce to One Layer" or "Convert Layer to Lasso" to having shortcuts like "Trim to path". But maybe this is a matter of taste.
greenmorpher hat geschrieben:Note how the Properties Bar is similar to the PL Tool Settings palette but goes further bringing in information from various tools or palettes, being oriented towards the object selected rather than any particular tool.
From your description, the Properties Bar seems a combination of the Tool Settings panel and the Attributes panel. For bitmap images, I think that it makes sense to separate properties of the selected layer (object) from those of the chosen tool (for objects to be created). For vector objects, the situation is different, and a properties bar might make more sense. For me personally, it doesn't make much difference if these are two panels or just one, since I always seem to need both, anyway.

Cheers,

Burkhard.
Benutzeravatar
Hoogo
Beta Tester
Beiträge: 4169
Registriert: So 03 Jul 2005 13:35
Wohnort: Deutschland

Re: Reaction to a Review

Beitrag von Hoogo »

bkh hat geschrieben:
greenmorpher hat geschrieben:There are two kinds of selection for both vector and raster objects -- the object selection (where you do the overall stuff) and the editing selection (where you do the detail stuff). Kind of.
I imagine the first kind is like the layer tool in PL. But I don't understand the second one.
I have to re-read all this when there is more time, but last Weekend I spent some hours with blender. Hell, that program is just titanic :shock: But as far as I understand it seems to have a similar idea as geoffrey describes. There's a mode to grab objects and change them as whole. And there's a mode to get into the details of the objects, move surfaces and stuff like that. Ther are some more modes, all display different buttons and menus.

When I rethink... Beside the different menus it's just like the layer tool versus the other tools in PL. But it feels different.
Benutzeravatar
greenmorpher
Mitglied
Beiträge: 943
Registriert: Di 29 Mai 2007 14:42
Wohnort: Rabaul, Papua New Guinea

Re: Reaction to a Review

Beitrag von greenmorpher »

Hiya Burkhardt

MENUS

I’m not thinking about what users can change, I’m thinking about what the Hubers can change. There are significant problems with the existing menus as well as with the contents of the menus. There are ways out of this. I am simply putting forward one alternative schema that I know. It’s worth thinking about, I believe.

LAYERS

I’m not advocating one or the other -- I was simply remarking on a difference. In effect, each Canvas object is a separate layer, except that there is then another kind of layer, which is different. PL achieves much the same thing by allowing grouping. PL is coming from a notion of separate layers, as in a paint program, while Canvas is coming from a notion of physical items put on a physical page, as in a desktop publishing program. In Canvas, a layer is like a transparent overlay you might put on a page then you can move some of the page contents to it. You can group stuff in 
Canvas too, of course.

In fact, in Canvas, you have the Document Layout Palette on which everything is listed and you can select stuff and move it up or down the hierarchy as in PL, delete it, move it to different layers or pages, etc. You also select the items on the page by clicking on them, move them up or down in the stacking order with keyboard shortcuts, and even move them to different layers or pages (but retaining their position on the page) through a contextual menu (a very handy action). You can also create new Canvas type layers (like overlays) and move stuff to them, and change the order of those layers.

SELECTION

The two kinds of selection are illustrated. The figure 6 has been turned into a path, then double clicked to vector edit mode to give access to the individual points which make up the path. Individual points can then be edited. The individual flower picture has been double clicked to put it in paint edit mode so the bucket could be used to fill a color, for example.

Hoogo’s got it right with his comparison with Blender.

REDUCE TO ONE LAYER

Burkhardt wrote:
[q]To do something like "Trim to path" in PL, you'd convert the vector path to a layer mask (the equivalent of a clipping path), then use "Reduce to one layer".
Alternatively, you convert the vector path to a lasso, and then crop the resulting selection.

Now "Reduce to one layer" works for whatever complicated combination of layers you have created previously, not just in the particular case of a layer mask. And converting a vector path to a selection can be used for many purposes, not just for cropping. Frankly, I prefer a simple combination of more universal commands like "Reduce to One Layer" or "Convert Layer to Lasso" to having shortcuts like "Trim to path". But maybe this is a matter of taste.[/q]

Canvas has both the “Convert Path to (lasso) Selection” and “Convert (lasso) Selection to Path”; also “Invert Selection”, so that background can be removed and such-like. The “Trim to Path” command is just a convenience but a very handy one.

PL’s “Reduce to one layer” has one disadvantage, it is destructive. Whatever you start with ends up as a raster image and the originals are lost. In Canvas, that is “Render” -- where Canvas makes a raster image of the selected objects, but it does not destroy the originals -- they remain so you have a choice about whether you want to get rid of them or not. Sure, you can get around this in PL by saving a duplicate document under a different name -- Canvas just allows you to put those things in a different order OR save a document with both the original items plus the rendered (converted to one layer) item.

In the bunch of photos and numbers in the sample file used here, I selected everything, rendered it, then selected the new raster object, saved it off as a 72 dpi JPEG, and emailed it to some friends for identification of the flowers. But I kept the master file of raster and text objects (the numbers) which I saved as a Canvas file because I might add some more pictures in the future.

PROPERTIES BAR

Burkhardt wrote:
[Q]From your description, the Properties Bar seems a combination of the Tool Settings panel and the Attributes panel.[/Q]

Those would be major components, but it is more than that. It often draws from three to five different menus or palettes. To be honest, it is actually hard to imagine how useful it is. I resisted it initially, then was forced into using it because there were a couple of useful new functions in it that hadn’t been incorporated back into the older menus and palettes. After a couple of weeks of using it, I couldn’t live without it.

One of the great advantages of it over the little palettes PL has is that between the Palette Docking Bar and the Properties Bar, you maximize screen freedom without compromising readability and usability of the interface. When I am using PL, I have a bunch of palettes open on the right hand side of the screen. I have a 22” 1680 x 1050 monitor and a pair of glasses set to the distance my face is from the screen, but those palettes are STILL bloody small and hard to read. The Properties Bar means stuff can be that bit bigger because it has the relevant information and ONLY the relevant information open at any time. And, of course, the palettes can be bigger because they’re docked. Docking is a much simpler action to opening and closing palettes -- particularly small ones with a tiny click target.

---

But enough -- I’m not trying to sell any particular schema or way of working. I am just pointing out that there are other integrated programs which offer some alternatives to the way the PhotoLine does things.

I don’t for one minute imagine any of these will be picked up and used in PL. I think it’s an awful pity that some serious reshuffling of the UI, the nomenclature, and the manual aren’t going to happen because it’s a powerful program which lots more people could use if only they could understand how it works! ;-)

Cheers, Geoff

Geoffrey Heard
Publisher, Editor, Business Writer
The Worsley Press

FREE Bonus book offer. Get "How to make great ads for (sm)all business" FREE when you buy "Type & Layout: Are you communicating or just making pretty shapes?" or "How to Start and Produce a Magazine or Newsletter". Amazon or http://www.worsleypress.com
Du hast keine ausreichende Berechtigung, um die Dateianhänge dieses Beitrags anzusehen.
Benutzeravatar
OldRadioGuy
Mitglied
Beiträge: 418
Registriert: Fr 24 Apr 2009 19:09
Wohnort: Austin, Texas, USA

Re: Reaction to a Review

Beitrag von OldRadioGuy »

lutz hat geschrieben:OldRadioGuy,
you have posted a very nice PhotoLine review on the CNet site. May I quote it in future?
Yes, you may.

Bob
PhotoLine 24.xx |DxO PureRAW 4 |Various Third-Party Plugins | macOS 14.11 | Apple M2 Max | 64 GB Memory | E-M1markIII.
Benutzeravatar
Hoogo
Beta Tester
Beiträge: 4169
Registriert: So 03 Jul 2005 13:35
Wohnort: Deutschland

Re: Reaction to a Review

Beitrag von Hoogo »

greenmorpher hat geschrieben:And then there’s the dock...
That horizontal dock looks interesting, I can imagine all of PLs palettes there. But isn't an opened palette in the middle of the screen, above the picture, disturbing?

And you were aware that the entries in the image-menu apply for raster-images - but entries in other menus apply to them, too. You mentioned "effects". That's something we tried to cope with in our menu suggestions.
and
Mitglied
Beiträge: 125
Registriert: Mi 03 Feb 2010 14:36

Re: Reaction to a Review

Beitrag von and »

greenmorpher hat geschrieben:LAYERS (…)

SELECTION (…)

REDUCE TO ONE LAYER (…)

PROPERTIES BAR (…)
Hmm, I am beginning to wonder why you use PhotoLine at all. :?
Windows 10 64 Bit You better watch out, there may be dogs about.
Benutzeravatar
greenmorpher
Mitglied
Beiträge: 943
Registriert: Di 29 Mai 2007 14:42
Wohnort: Rabaul, Papua New Guinea

Re: Reaction to a Review

Beitrag von greenmorpher »

Hoogo hat geschrieben:
greenmorpher hat geschrieben:And then there’s the dock...
That horizontal dock looks interesting, I can imagine all of PLs palettes there.
Exactly -- and that would allow those palettes to be made larger so they were easier to see and use.
Hoogo hat geschrieben:But isn't an opened palette in the middle of the screen, above the picture, disturbing?
Opening a palette from the Docking Bar isn't a problem. I have the palettes I might want to use from the Docking Bar grouped at either end of it. In any case, unless it is for just a one or two click adjustment, you tend to drag the palette out of the docking bar to a vacant screen area to open. And, of course, since the advent of the Properties Bar, the tendency is to use the palettes much less.
Hoogo hat geschrieben:And you were aware that the entries in the image-menu apply for raster-images - but entries in other menus apply to them, too. You mentioned "effects". That's something we tried to cope with in our menu suggestions.
SOME entries in other sections, and only when they are in object selection mode. Obviously, you can apply Effect > Shadows to picture objects just as you can to vector objects. Some of the Combine (objects) work with a vector and a raster object, but not with two raster objects. It's mostly pretty obvious.
and hat geschrieben:Hmm, I am beginning to wonder why you use PhotoLine at all.
Bob the Old Radio Guy's listing of RAW processing capabilities in which he gives ACDSee a high rating is a pointer. ACD bought Canvas from the original developers, mined it for some vector/type features to add to its photo editor(s), but didn't add anything to Canvas's raster capabilities. They also stopped supporting the Mac version. I went looking for something more modern in photo editing for Mac to complement Canvas which I use for all kinds of work, but particularly vector-based work, DTP and websites. I found PL. However, while PL is significantly more advanced than Canvas for raster image work, a combination of feature development in iPhoto, my difficulties in using PL because of its UI and odd nomenclature, and the elimination of bugs in Canvas -- not by ACD doing anything but by Apple cleaning up its OS in OS X.6.x (so Canvas X was suffering from OS bugs, not Canvas bugs) -- mean I am using PL less and less. And the less I work in the odd interface, the harder it is to access wanted features.

Cheers, Geoff

Geoffrey Heard
Publisher, Editor, Business Writer
The Worsley Press

FREE Bonus book offer. Get "How to make great ads for (sm)all business" FREE when you buy "Type & Layout: Are you communicating or just making pretty shapes?" or "How to Start and Produce a Magazine or Newsletter". Amazon or http://www.worsleypress.com
and
Mitglied
Beiträge: 125
Registriert: Mi 03 Feb 2010 14:36

Re: Reaction to a Review

Beitrag von and »

greenmorpher hat geschrieben:(…) They also stopped supporting the Mac version. (…)
Alas! I see! Thank you. :)
Windows 10 64 Bit You better watch out, there may be dogs about.