There seems to be a discrepancy in the way PL is handling RAW files. I'm going to show the differences between RW2 images from the Panasonic LF1 and those same images that were run through Adobe's DNG converter.
Here's a comparison of the images opened in DigiKam, which does not currently support the RW2 images from the LF1:
The images look as expected -- the RW2 image is washed out and has a general "haze", while the DNG image looks fine with the correct Black values. This is how these two images look in simple viewing apps, as well.
Here are those images opened in PL (18.40b8):
Both imageslook exactly the same, and are slightly washed out without good Black values. I expected the DNG image to look like the example posted above from DigiKam.
How are RAW images processed?
-
photoken
- Mitglied
- Beiträge: 2162
- Registriert: Sa 28 Sep 2013 01:25
How are RAW images processed?
Du hast keine ausreichende Berechtigung, um die Dateianhänge dieses Beitrags anzusehen.
Ken
Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done....
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done....
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
-
photoken
- Mitglied
- Beiträge: 2162
- Registriert: Sa 28 Sep 2013 01:25
Re: How are RAW images processed?
To continue the comparison, these sets of images are from programs which specifically support the RW2 images from the LF1 -- PaintShopPro X6 SP2, and RawTherapee 4.0.12.70.
First the example from PSP: And the images from RT (using the "Neutral" processing profile for each): In all these comparisons, I consider the DNG converted image (as shown in DigiKam, PSP, and RT) to be the "standard" conversion; and that the RW2 image will ultimately approach its Black level quality by manual manipulation.
To sum up, it seems that the other 3 programs treat DNG images as special and do not attempt to apply any "corrections" to DNG images. It looks like PL applies its default "corrections" to DNG images, and this is not what should be done.
First the example from PSP: And the images from RT (using the "Neutral" processing profile for each): In all these comparisons, I consider the DNG converted image (as shown in DigiKam, PSP, and RT) to be the "standard" conversion; and that the RW2 image will ultimately approach its Black level quality by manual manipulation.
To sum up, it seems that the other 3 programs treat DNG images as special and do not attempt to apply any "corrections" to DNG images. It looks like PL applies its default "corrections" to DNG images, and this is not what should be done.
Du hast keine ausreichende Berechtigung, um die Dateianhänge dieses Beitrags anzusehen.
Ken
Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done....
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done....
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
-
SCX
- Mitglied
- Beiträge: 337
- Registriert: Mi 12 Nov 2008 09:34
Re: How are RAW images processed?
It's only a RAW-import in PhotoLine. I suggest to use a RAW-Konverter and export the images to PhotoLine if necessary.