Herbert123 wrote: Perhaps we could indeed have these additional options in the User Interface preferences:
1) turn off the selection highlighting for multiple selected layers for users who prefer the traditional checkbox only.
That is all I'm asking for. Without re-visiting the argument about good UI design, an option to disable the layer selection colours will make everyone happy.
When it comes to the colours (themes) used for the GUI, there is no one solution that will make everyone happy. That is why it is not good to force a colour scheme on users who prefer a dark UI, or a bright UI. So, your suggestion of implementing personalized "themes" for the UI makes sense. Having such "themes" might also address the display problem that two users are having with menu items -- those of us without display problems can use dark menu items in the release version and those with display problems can simply use a theme without dark menu items.
Hi Ken, I very much agree with you: if we could have more user control over most of the colours of Photoline's GUI, it will become much easier to create pleasing looking combinations that would be sharable between users with themes. You would not even have to add an option to turn off the multiple layer selection highlighting: just set it to the colour of the unselected layers.
I believe it would make everyone happy. It does mean, however, that the devs have to add a dedicated GUI colours section in the preferences, and with all the different items in PL's interface, that might take some time to implement.
Herbert123 wrote:
...
I believe it would make everyone happy. It does mean, however, that the devs have to add a dedicated GUI colours section in the preferences, and with all the different items in PL's interface, that might take some time to implement.
Yes, that is why I'm requesting a simple "disable" option for the selected layer colours. Then, the more complex UI themes, etc., could be implemented at leisure....
BTW, you earlier wrote:
Herbert123 wrote:
Vector masking is very pleasant now: the preview works great.
I don't notice any difference when using a vector object as a clipping mask.... What am I missing?
Ken Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done....
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
photoken wrote:Win7 x64 SP1 PL 18.90b7 x64 Steps to reproduce:
Open a JPG image.
Use the Rectangle Lasso tool to create a lasso.
Move the cursor over one of the lasso's handles.
Result:
The cursor does not change to a "modification" cursor, and the lasso's sides cannot be moved, adjusted, etc.
don't get this problem here. Any "special" settings for the lasso?
Gerhard
Hab ich hier auch. Die Reaktion der Handles scheint 50 Pixel nach unten und 10 Pixel nach rechts verschoben zu sein. Hat man die Stellen gefunden, dann erscheinen auch die anderen Cursor und sind auch benutzbar, aber nach der Benutzung springt der Rahmen weitere 10/50 Pixel weiter.
----------------
Herr Doktor, ich bin mir ganz sicher, ich habe Atom! /Doctor, doctor, I'm sure, I've got atoms!
The issue of closing an unsaved image and answering "Yes" to save the image: http://www.pl32.com/forum3/viewtopic.ph ... 493#p32702
has been fixed. I now get the "Save As" dialog to specify the file name, type and location.
Thanks, again!
Ken Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done....
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
The issue with exiting PL after using an external editor: http://www.pl32.com/forum3/viewtopic.ph ... 476#p32592
has been fixed. Now we get a prompt to save the image, and answering "Yes" automatically saves the image.
More thanks....
Ken Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done....
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
Result:
The cursor does not change to a "modification" cursor, and the lasso's sides cannot be moved, adjusted, etc.
Same in the OS X version (10.9.1). However, unlike Hoogo, I haven't been able to find the hot spots elsewhere.
Another (possibly related) problem: if I create a lasso for a layer whose top left corner is offset from the top left corner of the bg layer, then the lasso appears at a position different from where I drew it (probably by the same offset as the layer).
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
PhotoLine 21 & Betas, Win-10 Pro 64-bit, ACDSee Photo Studio Ultimate 2018, Dxo Optics Pro 9, Panasonic DMC-G6 "Der Nachteil der Intelligenz besteht darin, dass man ununterbrochen gezwungen ist, dazuzulernen."
George Bernard Shaw
bkh wrote:However, unlike Hoogo, I haven't been able to find the hot spots elsewhere.
Same here -- no "hot spots" anywhere.
My picture was small, 1000*600, viewed at 100%. With a deeper zoom the problem was gone.
3000*1800, viewed at 24%, had hotspots, but they were even more far away.
----------------
Herr Doktor, ich bin mir ganz sicher, ich habe Atom! /Doctor, doctor, I'm sure, I've got atoms!