PhotoLine and layers from a PSD file

Here everybody can post his problems with PhotoLine
Benutzeravatar
OldRadioGuy
Mitglied
Beiträge: 418
Registriert: Fr 24 Apr 2009 19:09
Wohnort: Austin, Texas, USA

PhotoLine and layers from a PSD file

Beitrag von OldRadioGuy »

When reading a PSD file created from another product such as Photoshop Elements or Perfect Photo Suite, PhotoLine shows the the PSD thumbnail at the top of the layer stack.

Is there a reason for displaying the Photoshop document file thumbnail as a layer?

Photoshop Elements, PaintShop Pro and PhotoPlus don't show the PSD thumbnail in the layer stack, and PL doesn't display its own PLD file thumbnail as a layer.

If display of the PSD thumbnail in layers in PhotoLine is of no importance to users, should it be removed?

Bob
PhotoLine 24.xx |DxO PureRAW 4 |Various Third-Party Plugins | macOS 14.11 | Apple M2 Max | 64 GB Memory | E-M1markIII.
Benutzeravatar
photoken
Mitglied
Beiträge: 2162
Registriert: Sa 28 Sep 2013 01:25

Re: PhotoLine and layers from a PSD file

Beitrag von photoken »

One reason I like seeing the PSD thumbnail as a layer is that I can delete it before re-saving the file in another format.
Ken
Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done....
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
Martin Huber
Entwickler
Entwickler
Beiträge: 4298
Registriert: Di 19 Nov 2002 15:49

Re: PhotoLine and layers from a PSD file

Beitrag von Martin Huber »

OldRadioGuy hat geschrieben:Is there a reason for displaying the Photoshop document file thumbnail as a layer?
PSD is a complex, widely undocumented file format. By showing the thumbnail as a layer, you can better check whether it has been imported correctly.

Martin
Benutzeravatar
asharpe
Mitglied
Beiträge: 90
Registriert: Mo 23 Dez 2013 07:01
Wohnort: Palo Alto, California, USA

Re: PhotoLine and layers from a PSD file

Beitrag von asharpe »

Martin Huber hat geschrieben: PSD is a complex, widely undocumented file format. By showing the thumbnail as a layer, you can better check whether it has been imported correctly.
Martin
Indeed. So, perhaps you can eventually address http://www.pl32.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4078 , and not continue that tradition of closed, undocumented formats? :)
Martin Huber
Entwickler
Entwickler
Beiträge: 4298
Registriert: Di 19 Nov 2002 15:49

Re: PhotoLine and layers from a PSD file

Beitrag von Martin Huber »

asharpe hat geschrieben:So, perhaps you can eventually address http://www.pl32.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4078 , and not continue that tradition of closed, undocumented formats? :)
I understand this request, but documenting the PLD format would cost us weeks. And how many people would use this documentation? Whoever wants to handle the PLD format, has to deal with multiple pages, virtual copies, 8-, 16- 32-bit images, groups acting as layer mask/adjustment mask, and many other things. So the audience for a documentation is very, very limited.

Martin
Benutzeravatar
OldRadioGuy
Mitglied
Beiträge: 418
Registriert: Fr 24 Apr 2009 19:09
Wohnort: Austin, Texas, USA

Re: PhotoLine and layers from a PSD file

Beitrag von OldRadioGuy »

OldRadioGuy hat geschrieben:When reading a PSD file created from another product such as Photoshop Elements or Perfect Photo Suite, PhotoLine shows the the PSD thumbnail at the top of the layer stack.

Bob
Just as a matter of information, I note that a PSD file created by Lightroom for editing in PhotoLine does not produce a thumbnail layer when PL opens. It's only files that have been saved in Photoshop Elements and onOne's Perfect Photo Suite and then opened in PhotoLine where I see that behavior. (Of course there are likely others.)

Bob
PhotoLine 24.xx |DxO PureRAW 4 |Various Third-Party Plugins | macOS 14.11 | Apple M2 Max | 64 GB Memory | E-M1markIII.
Benutzeravatar
asharpe
Mitglied
Beiträge: 90
Registriert: Mo 23 Dez 2013 07:01
Wohnort: Palo Alto, California, USA

Re: PhotoLine and layers from a PSD file

Beitrag von asharpe »

Martin Huber hat geschrieben:
asharpe hat geschrieben:So, perhaps you can eventually address http://www.pl32.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4078 , and not continue that tradition of closed, undocumented formats? :)
...documenting the PLD format would cost us weeks. And how many people would use this documentation? Whoever wants to handle the PLD format, has to deal with multiple pages, virtual copies, 8-, 16- 32-bit images, groups acting as layer mask/adjustment mask, and many other things. So the audience for a documentation is very, very limited.
I understand. It was simply a plea to try to keep things as open as possible. And the most important user of the documentation for the format? That would be you, and your staff, for future maintenance of the product.